The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision allows the president to start the process to end automatic birthright citizenship.

The Supreme Court did not rule last week on whether President Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship was constitutional. But the court did pave the way for that order to take effect in ...

Mister “Liberation Day” is suddenly tired of his tariff plan. The newest chapter in Donald Trump’s global trade rearrangement ...

The following expert comment below was written by Alex Sarch, Professor of Law at the University of Surrey, after the ...

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that lower-court judges will no longer have the power to issue nationwide injunctions — not ...

Law professor and former Donald Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz asserted that the president would lose his bid to end ...

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig stunned CNN anchor Kate Bolduan on Monday by explaining that states could have conflicting ...

Welcome to the Daily News Brief, CFR’s flagship morning newsletter summarizing the top global news and analysis of the ...

No, the Supreme Court did NOT strike down birthright citizenship in the decision handed down Friday, Trump v. Casa et.al. Instead, the Republican majority voted to purposefully sidestep the merits and ...

GOOD MORNING, DAN. LET’S START WITH YOU EXPLAINING WHAT THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION REGARDING THE NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS IN THE BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CASE REALLY MEANS. SURE. GOOD MORNING. MALLORY.

In a 6–3 ruling, the justices sharply limited the use of nationwide injunctions, sweeping court orders that can freeze a federal policy for the entire country, even when only a handful of plaintiffs ...

The case emerged from legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting birthright citizenship, which seeks to deny automatic American citizenship to children born to undocumented ...